June 8, 2015 at 2:20 pm #10193Tom TutschParticipant
With all of the wonderful improvements at CTMP, we have lost a bit of volume for track announcements. After an incident, I often am part of a group saying”do you know when we are supposed to go out next? It occurred to me that it might be easy to use our smart phones to allow the tower to get info out to the group. Peter Carrol or one of the other tech whizzes may have a better solution, but it may be as simple as a Twitter feed, or a Facebook post that we are all subscribed to.
This is certainly not a complaint, as John et al do an awesome job every day. Thanks to John and the whole track team.June 9, 2015 at 7:48 am #10207FFaustParticipant
Great idea.June 9, 2015 at 10:36 am #10209DaveOsborneParticipant
While we may be out of touch with the paddock during an incident I can assure you that we are very busy on other radio frequencies and in constant communication with the Tower. When something happens on track, whether it’s a mechanical or an incident our primary focus is always the safety of whomever is involved and getting the program up and running as soon as possible. Any information given to the paddock must be correct, and that often involves waiting for additional equipment (sweeper truck or bobcat to lift tires) and recovering the vehicles involved. We have asked the staging people to keep the frequencies clear as well, so they aren’t encouraged to ask for updates either.
The issue of instant updating for us would be the inaccuracy of the information. Say; we thought an oil cleanup might take 15 minutes. If we announce that information and then it takes 15 minutes to get the sweeper there, we may have to move on to the next run group and the grid would be full of the wrong cars. Rarely are the estimates accurate until we reach the last 5 minutes and the service vehicles have started to move. At that time the Tower announces who is up next and begins to grid them. While this is an instant information age, inaccurate information can be more harmful than none.
The upside of this practice is that you can be assured that if anything ever goes wrong for you, you will have our complete and undivided attention until the situation is resolved. Safety is always our primary focus.June 9, 2015 at 11:34 am #10210FFaustParticipant
Dave, while you are correct, I think that what Tom is asking for is simply an additional means of communicating the information.
In other words, once the tower has the ‘final’ info, and announces it on the PA system, we can barely hear it, if at all in many parts of the paddock.
There is no question that safety is always the priority, but sometimes it’s hard to figure out if or how the schedule is affected by on or off-track events (severe weather delays, for instance).
… or maybe we simply increase the volume on the PA system.June 10, 2015 at 2:09 pm #10215John AdamParticipant
Perhaps Super Dave can take under advisement that CTMP should be advised about the issues with their PA system. Not that Myles will immediately make changes . . .
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.